0
5.0kviews
Compare monolithic and micro-kernels
written 7.9 years ago by | modified 5.3 years ago by |
Mumbai University > Information Technology > Sem5 > Operating System
Marks: 5M
Year: Dec14
ADD COMMENT
EDIT
1 Answer
written 7.9 years ago by | modified 5.3 years ago by |
Mumbai University > Information Technology > Sem5 > Operating System
Marks: 5M
Year: Dec14
written 7.9 years ago by |
Feature | Monolithic kernel | Microkernel |
---|---|---|
Approach | Older | Newer |
Definition | A monolithic kernel is one single program that contains all of the code necessary to perform every kernel related task. | A Microkernel is a kernel design,that provides no OS services at all, only the mechanisms needed to implement those services. |
Size of OS | Large | Quite small |
Hardware Abstraction | Provides powerful abstractions of the underlying hardware. | Provides a smaller set of simple,hardware abstractions. |
Speed | Faster | Slower |
Memory Management | In kernel space | In user space |
Security and Stability | Because of the "hardwiring" of system processes and the resulting,dependency of the monolithic,approach, it is assumable that other,processes will also crash, resulting in a system-wide halt. | Excluding system processes from kernel space overcomes these problems. Also, It is easier to ensure the correctness of a small kernel, than a big one. That way, stability issues are simpler to solve with that approach. |
Inter Process Communication | Uses signals and sockets | Uses message queues |
Extensibility and Portability | Adding new features to a monolithic system means recompilation of the whole kernel, often including the whole driver infrastructure. | As the services are isolated from each other through the message,system, it is enough to re-implement the new memory,manager. |
Example | Unix, MS-DOS and the early Mac OS | AIX, BeOS, Mach, Mac OS X,,MINIX, and QNX. Etc |