Question: Describe State Transition Model based event correlation technique.
0

Subject: Telecom Network Management

Topic: Broadband Network Management

Difficulty: Medium

tnm(38) • 3.4k views
ADD COMMENTlink
modified 19 months ago by gravatar for mankar.shubhangi07 mankar.shubhangi0720 written 2.7 years ago by gravatar for Tabassum Tabassum80
0

State Transition Graph Model:

  • A state transition graph, similar to a sequence diagram, is followed to detect problems and make decisions.

  • Can be used instead of or as a complement to other techniques.

  • It is best to illustrate with an example of how a state transition diagram could be used to correlate events in the network. When the hub is working and the connectivity to the NMS is good, a response is received for each ping sent, say every minute, by the NMS. This is represented by the top two states, ping hub and receive response, refer Figure 1.

State transition model

Fig1: State transition model

  • Consider the situation when a response for a ping is not received before the next ping is ready to be sent. NMS typically expects a response in 300 milliseconds. An action is taken by the NMS and the state transitions from receive response to pinged twice.

  • It is possible that a response is received for the second ping and in that situation the state transitions back to the normal ping hub state. However, if there is no response for the second ping, NMS pings a third time. The state transition is now pinged three times. The response for this ping will cause a transition to the ping hub state.

  • Let us assume that the NMS is configured to ping three times before it declares that there is a communication failure between it and the hub. Without any correlation, an alarm will be triggered and the icon representing the hub would turn red.

State transition model Example

  • However, the hub may actually be working and the workstations on it may all be communicating with each other. From the topology database, the correlator in the NMS is aware that the path to the hub is via the router. Hence, on failure of the third ping, an action is taken and the system transitions to the ping router state. The router is pinged and the system transitions to the receive response from muter state.

  • There are two possible outcomes now. The connectivity to the router is lost and no response is received from the router. The system takes no action, which is indicated by the closed loop in the ping router state. The second possibility is that a response is received from the router. This means that the connection to the hub is lost. Now, the correlator in the NMS triggers an alarm that turns the hub icon red.

ADD COMMENTlink
modified 2.7 years ago  • written 2.7 years ago by gravatar for Tabassum Tabassum80
0

State Transition Graph Model:

State transition Model physical network

• A state transition graph, similar to a sequence diagram, is followed to detect problems and make decisions.

• Can be used instead of or as a complement to other techniques.

• It is best to illustrate with an example of how a state transition diagram could be used to correlate events in the network. When the hub is working and the connectivity to the NMS is good, a response is received for each ping sent, say every minute, by the NMS. This is represented by the top two states, ping hub and receive response, refer Figure 1(a)

• Consider the situation when a response for a ping is not received before the next ping is ready to be sent. NMS typically expects a response in 300 milliseconds. An action is taken by the NMS and the state transitions from receive response to pinged twice.

• It is possible that a response is received for the second ping and in that situation the state transitions back to the normal ping hub state. However, if there is no response for the second ping, NMS pings a third time. The state transition is now pinged three times. The response for this ping will cause a transition to the ping hub state. State Transition Graph

• Let us assume that the NMS is configured to ping three times before it declares that there is a communication failure between it and the hub. Without any correlation, an alarm will be triggered and the icon representing the hub would turn red.

• However, the hub may actually be working and the workstations on it may all be communicating with each other. From the topology database, the correlator in the NMS is aware that the path to the hub is via the router. Hence, on failure of the third ping, an action is taken and the system transitions to the ping router state. The router is pinged and the system transitions to the receive response from muter state.

• There are two possible outcomes now. The connectivity to the router is lost and no response is received from the router. The system takes no action, which is indicated by the closed loop in the ping router state. The second possibility is that a response is received from the router. This means that the connection to the hub is lost. Now, the correlator in the NMS triggers an alarm that turns the hub icon red.

ADD COMMENTlink
written 19 months ago by gravatar for mankar.shubhangi07 mankar.shubhangi0720
Please log in to add an answer.