The criteria for an assessment of a quality of an image are (i) Objective Fidelity Criteria and (ii) Subjective Fidelity Criteria.
Objective Fidelity Criteria:
- Mean Square Error (MSE):
Let f(x,y) represent an input image and let $\hat f(x,y)$ denote an estimate or approximate of f(x,y) for any value of x and y,
The mean squared error is defined as,
$$MSE = \frac{1}{MxN} \sum_{x=0}^{M-1} /sum_{y=0}^{N-1} [f(x,y) - \hat f(x,y)]^2$$
- Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR):
$$SNR = \frac{\sum_{x=0}^{M-1} \sum_{y=0}^{N-1} [f(x,y)]^2}{\sum_{x=0}^{M-1} \sum_{y=0}^{N-1} [f(x,y) - \hat f(x,y)]^2}$$
Subjective Fidelity Criteria:
- Images are viewed by human beings. Therefore measuring image quality by the subjective evaluations of a human observer is more appropriate. This can be
accomplished by showing a typical decompressed image to an appropriate cross section of viewers and averaging their evaluations.
- The evaluations may be made by using an absolute rating scale or by means of side by side comparison of f(x,y)and f ̂(x,y).
- Side by side comparisons can be done with the following scale:
- {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}to represent evaluations such as {Excellent, Fine, Passable, Marginal, Inferior, Unusable} respectively.
- {-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3} to represent subjective evaluations such as {much worse, worse, slightly worse, the same, slightly better, better, much better} respectively.
These evaluations are said to be based on subjective fidelity criteria:
Value |
Rating |
Description |
1 |
Excellent |
An image of extremely high quality as good as you could desire. |
2 |
Fine |
An image of high quality providing enjoyable viewing. Interference is somewhat objectionable. |
3 |
Passable |
An image of acceptable quality. Interference is somewhat objectionable. |
4 |
Marginal |
An image of poor quality that you wish could be improved. Interference is somewhat objectionable. |
5 |
Inferior |
A very poor image but can be viewed. Objectionable interference is definitely present. |
6 |
Unusable |
An image so bad that it cannot be viewed. |